Market Pulse
BTC — — Vol —
ETH — — Vol —
BNB — — Vol —
SOL — — Vol —
XRP — — Vol —
ADA — — Vol —
DOGE — — Vol —
TRX — — Vol —
TON — — Vol —
AVAX — — Vol —
POL — — Vol —
LINK — — Vol —
USDT — — Vol —
USDC — — Vol —
UNI — — Vol —
CAKE — — Vol —
AAVE — — Vol —
SUI — — Vol —
BTC — — Vol —
ETH — — Vol —
BNB — — Vol —
SOL — — Vol —
XRP — — Vol —
ADA — — Vol —
DOGE — — Vol —
TRX — — Vol —
TON — — Vol —
AVAX — — Vol —
POL — — Vol —
LINK — — Vol —
USDT — — Vol —
USDC — — Vol —
UNI — — Vol —
CAKE — — Vol —
AAVE — — Vol —
SUI — — Vol —

Scam, Trust & Safety Case Studies

Case Study: Impersonation on Social Media

A safety case study explaining how impersonation accounts target crypto users through replies, DMs, fake support, and fake claims.

What this case study explains

The pattern behind the event

Impersonators often appear during launches, airdrops, exchange issues, wallet problems, or public complaints.

User misunderstanding

Why this often becomes confusing

Users may trust accounts that copy profile photos, names, or reply under real project posts.

What to check

How to review the situation more safely

  • Check the official source before trusting a link, claim, pair, or announcement.
  • Review wallet prompts, token approvals, network selection, and contract addresses before signing.
  • Separate visible market activity from deeper structure such as liquidity, incentives, supply, and permissions.
  • Use block explorers and neutral tools to verify what happened instead of relying only on social posts.

Neutral takeaway

The useful lesson

Social links should be verified from official websites and cross-checked before clicking or connecting a wallet.

Search